Unanswered Questions about Lockett's Pocket Money
To: diane.woods@surreypct.nhs.uk
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 9:04 PM
Subject: Freedom Of Information Request
Dear Diane
I have been able to ascertain that you will be able to help me. I would like to how much the PCT (previously called East Surrey PCT) paid for Helen Lockett to do her work in post as Project manager by the Work Services Commissioning Group (see email below for clarity and ease of understanding) . You will note the post was nationally advertised and publically paid for . MY understanding according to the email below is the PCT paid for the post .
Please be good enough to outline the costs of the Project Manager and any other associated costs with her role ..
Regards
Paul Brian Tovey
Independent Monitor Mental Health Matters ...
Email Sent to me below by : katy.turner@surreycc.gov.uk
Dear Mr Tovey
Thank you for your request for information under the Freedom of Information Act. Having examined your request I can now give you the following response:-
The Work Services Commissioning Group was a jointly commissioned service with Surrey County Council taking the lead commissioning role. The other commissioner was East Surrey Primary Care Trust (PCT).
1 What was the cost of this Post to the Council?
East Surrey PCT, not Surrey County Council, paid for the post of Project Manager held by Helen Lockett. The appointment followed a national advert for a project manager, which allowed the PCT to benchmark the costs of this post against other project manager posts. There was no specific budget allocated by the Work Services Commissioning Group for this post.
2 Were the costs of this Post shared with anyone else?
As stated above, East Surrey Primary Care Trust paid for this post.
3 Responsible Commissioners and their contact details?
Donal Hegarty (Policy & Commissioning Manager, Adult Mental Health & Substance Misuse, Surrey County Council):
donal.hegarty@surreycc.gov.uk 01483 517944
Diane Woods (Director of Mental Health & Learning Disability Commissioning, East Surrey Primary Care Trust):
diane.woods@eastsurrey-pct.nhs.uk 01737 214874
4 What kind of Democratic Mandate did the User and Carer Representatives on the Work Service Commissioning Group have?
The Commissioners were committed to have service users as part of the Group and although there was no Carer representative we did consult with local Carer groups. The service user representatives brought the user perspective to the Group and one of the representatives was mandated to keep service users in the area informed of progress. Because they represented the service user perspective they had a legitimate mandate to be part of the Group.
5 What was checked to ascertain that they were representative?
Both service user representatives came from East Surrey and had used services.
6 Did they receive Expenses or Payment for their time?
Both representatives were paid expenses for travel to attend meetings etc. This was paid by Surrey & Borders Partnership NHS Trust whom I am sure have a financial audit trail of expenses paid.
7 What Evidence did the Health Overview Scrutiny Committee obtain and retain for record that there was in fact individual informed service users “evidenced” consultation done at services.
The Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee would have a record of what was submitted and discussed at the meeting in November 2005. I would suggest that you contact Derek Cunningham, Policy & Development Manager on 0208 541 7591 (email: Derek.Cunningham@surreycc.gov.uk) as he supports this Committee and will have a record of all the relevant information submitted.
I hope this response addresses all the questions you have raised but if you require further information please do not hesitate to contact me.
Yours sincerely,
Donal Hegarty
Policy & Commissioning Manager
Mental Health & Substance Misuse
1 Comments:
The people who commissioned Helen Lockett seem most anxious to ignore the fact that taxpayers have been forced to pay for an additional review based on service users circumstances and needs because, and only because, Helen Lockett & SCMH screwed up.
Still, no worries, it was only taxpayers money she wasted....
Has anyone asked SABP how much the additional therapeutic earnings project - set up after SABP apologised for trying to rip off its disabled workers - cost?
Post a Comment
<< Home